We are closed on Nov 22 from Noon to 3PM for the Company Thanksgiving Celebration.

New research made by the European equivalent of the SEC has concluded that green funds would actually do far better in a climate-related stock market shock.

The investment world has been arguing about the pros and cons of green investment funds for a long time. But in many cases, investment analysts have concluded that green funds have lower returns, and their environmental benefits provide a value that is more difficult to value. 

However, new research made by the European equivalent of the SEC has concluded that green funds would actually do far better in a climate-related stock market shock.

And some details provided by a report from Investing.com have shown how extensive this research was.

“The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published what it described as a first attempt to assess vulnerabilities to climate-related financial risks using data from 23,965 EU-based funds worth 10.7 trillion euros ($12.7 trillion).”

The analysis showed that in a severe market shock, there was a considerable difference in losses. Green funds showed a loss between 3% and 7%, while brown or dirty funds could lose between 8% and 19%. 

That means that there is now a tangible value in clean funds as they provide a lot of downside protection. 


Chris is one of GreenCitizen’s writers who has been a long-time advocate of individual responsibility when it comes to the environment. He shares GreenCitizen's passion for making the world a better place every day of the year.

Subscribe to
our newsletter